For fans of the A-Leagues watching VAR in the 2026/27 season. Covers what VAR can review, clear and obvious error, checks and reviews, on-field reviews, offside, restarts, VARdict screens and how long reviews take.
The video assistant referee (VAR) is a match official with independent access to match footage who can assist the referee only for a clear and obvious error or serious missed incident. Under the IFAB VAR protocol:
Source: IFAB, Video Assistant Referee (VAR) protocol, 2026/27 Laws of the Game.
The IFAB VAR protocol lets the VAR assist the referee only for a clear and obvious error or serious missed incident in these categories:
Source: IFAB, Video Assistant Referee (VAR) protocol, 2026/27 Laws of the Game: https://www.theifab.com/laws/latest/video-assistant-referee-var-protocol/
It is the test the VAR must meet before it can step in. The IFAB VAR protocol says the VAR may assist only in the event of a "clear and obvious error" or a "serious missed incident" in one of the reviewable categories.
The protocol states the following about the test:
Source: IFAB, Video Assistant Referee (VAR) protocol, 2026/27 Laws of the Game.
Only the referee can start a review. The VAR and the other match officials can only recommend one. The referee can start a review when the VAR or another match official recommends it, or when the referee suspects that something serious has been missed.
Coaches and players do not need to ask for a check or review, because the VAR automatically checks every situation. The final decision is always taken by the referee, either on information from the VAR or after an on-field review.
Source: IFAB, Video Assistant Referee (VAR) protocol, 2026/27 Laws of the Game.
Under the IFAB VAR protocol:
Source: IFAB, Video Assistant Referee (VAR) protocol, 2026/27 Laws of the Game.
After the VAR describes what the replay shows, the referee chooses one of two routes (IFAB VAR protocol):
Which one suits which decision:
At the end of either process the referee shows the TV signal immediately followed by the final decision.
Source: IFAB, Video Assistant Referee (VAR) protocol, 2026/27 Laws of the Game.
Offside can be reviewed when it forms part of the build-up to a goal or a penalty (attacking team offences such as handball, foul or offside). A decision based on information from an assistant referee, such as offside, also needs a clear and obvious error before it is changed.
The IFAB VAR protocol separates two kinds of offside question:
The protocol says slow-motion replays should generally be used only for facts, such as the position of an offence or player.
It also covers the assistant referee's flag: delaying the flag is only permitted in a very clear attacking situation when a player is about to score or has a clear run into or towards the penalty area. If the flag was delayed, the assistant referee must raise it if the attacking team scores, or is awarded a penalty kick, free kick, corner kick or throw-in, or keeps possession after the initial attack has ended.
Source: IFAB, Video Assistant Referee (VAR) protocol, 2026/27 Laws of the Game.
The IFAB VAR protocol sets no maximum time for a review. It says the process should be completed as efficiently as possible, but the accuracy of the final decision is more important than speed. It adds that some situations are complex, with several reviewable decisions or incidents.
For goals, penalties and denying an obvious goal-scoring opportunity (DOGSO), it may be necessary to review the attacking phase of play that led directly to the incident, which can include how the attacking team gained possession in open play.
Source: IFAB, Video Assistant Referee (VAR) protocol, 2026/27 Laws of the Game.
Generally no. The IFAB VAR protocol says the Laws of the Game do not allow restart decisions (corner kicks, throw-ins and so on) to be changed once play has restarted, so they cannot be reviewed.
Once play has stopped and restarted, the referee may only review, and take the appropriate disciplinary action for:
One exception before the restart: a clearly incorrectly awarded corner kick can be reviewed only where the competition has chosen that option, and only if it can be changed immediately without delaying the restart.
Source: IFAB, Video Assistant Referee (VAR) protocol, 2026/27 Laws of the Game.
Football Australia announced in October 2025 that it would introduce VARdict in the Isuzu UTE A-League (men's competition) for the first time in 2025-26. It is an in-stadium system that gives real-time updates on big screens during VAR checks, so supporters can follow what is happening.
The same announcement said the A-Leagues Professional Referee Panel would expand from four to 13 officials, with six full-time and seven part-time referees.
Source: A-Leagues, "'Transparent' VAR first introduced to A-League for 2025-26", 16 October 2025: https://aleagues.com.au/news/a-league-2025-26-refereeing-announcing-casey-reibelt-var-update-details-reaction/
The IFAB VAR protocol says:
Source: IFAB, Video Assistant Referee (VAR) protocol, 2026/27 Laws of the Game.
In principle, no. The IFAB VAR protocol says a match is not invalidated because of:
If a VAR, assistant VAR or replay operator cannot start or continue and no qualified replacement can be found for the VAR or replay operator, the protocol says the match must be played or continue without VARs.
Source: IFAB, Video Assistant Referee (VAR) protocol, 2026/27 Laws of the Game.